7.56% for supply chain practices in China

The Green Supply Chain Corporate Information Transparency Index (CITI) evaluates consumer-facing companies that have a sizeable supply chain in China. The evaluation uses government supervision data and public information to assess the environmental management of their supply chains in China. This company received a score of 7.56/100 (retrieved 24 Nov 2023).

Source: IPE (2023)

4.9% in Forest 500 Rankings

Forest 500 identifies the 350 companies and 150 financial institutions with the greatest exposure to tropical deforestation risk, and annually assesses them on the strength and implementation of their deforestation and human rights commitments. This company received a score of 4.9%.

Source: Forest 500 (2023)

1% in Gender Benchmark

In 2023 and 2024, the World Benchmarking Alliance assessed 2,000 companies on their efforts to drive gender equality and women's empowerment across their entire value chain. Companies are assessed on governance and strategy, representation, compensation and benefits, health and well-being, and violence and harassment. This company scored 1 out of 100. The average score was 15.3 and the highest score was 51.

Source: World Benchmarking Alliance (2023)

6.5% in Social Benchmark

The 2026 Social Benchmark assessed the world's 2,000 most influential companies on their responsibility in meeting society's fundamental expectations towards three measurement areas: respecting human rights, providing decent work, and acting ethically. This company received a score of 6.5/100. The average score was 20 and the highest score was 75.

Source: World Benchmarking Alliance (2026)

0/100 in KnowTheChain Benchmark

In 2026 KnowTheChain benchmarked 45 food and beverage companies on their efforts to identify and tackle forced labour risks in their supply chains. This company received a score of 0/100. The average score was a disappointing 15 and the highest score was 56.

Source: KnowTheChain (2026)

FAIRR Protein Producer Index

The Coller FAIRR Protein Producer Index 2023/24 is a comprehensive assessment of how this sector is managing critical sustainability risks factors: GHGs; deforestation and biodiversity; water scarcity; water pollution; antibiotics; animal welfare; working conditions; food safety. This company was rated as high risk.

Source: FAIRR (2023)

8.7/100 in Food and Agriculture Benchmark

The 2026 Food and Agriculture Benchmark assessed 350 companies from the food and agriculture value chain on their contributions to healthy, sustainable, and inclusive food systems. Companies are assessed across four measurement areas: Healthy food systems, Sustainable food systems, Inclusive food systems and Governance. This company received a score of 8.7/100. The average score was 15.5 and the highest score was 61.2.

Source: World Benchmarking Alliance (2026)

High ESG Risk

Sustainalytics, a top ESG research firm, evaluates environmental, social, and governance risks for over 16,000 companies. Its ESG Risk Rating reflects how much risk a company faces in its industry and how well it manages those risks. The final score includes both unmanaged and unmanageable risks, and companies are rated on a scale from negligible (0-10) to severe (40+). This company received an ESG Risk Rating of 34.9, placing it in the "high risk" category (retrieved April 2025).

Source: Sustainalytics (2025)

10.3% in Nature Benchmark

The 2026 Nature Benchmark assessed 750 companies from high-impact industries on their efforts to advance a nature-positive future by cutting damaging practices across their operations and supply chains, and by actively restoring and improving ecosystems. Companies are assessed across four measurement areas: Governance, Planet, People and Core social indicators. This company received a score of 10.3/100. The average score was 17.3 and the highest score was 56.4.

Source: World Benchmarking Alliance (2026)